I figured I'd time stamp this one, since it's been a while and I've been seeing more and more of this lately
If you're like me, when you have a debate with someone it can either make you feel great or totally shitty. What you may have noticed is that this doesn't hinge on whether you "won" or convinced anyone. What it's really all about is whether the debate was polite and civil or whether it was out of control and rude. So without further ado, based on my experiences in debates, here is my unofficial guide to feeling good while debating
1. Personal insults never help
Imagine you argue for a point and someone suggests that you're wrong, and you likely hold this wrong opinion because you're stupid. Even if you later realize you're wrong, what would you estimate your chances are of admitting it after that? Probably pretty low. Now instead of feeling like you can politely concede the point, you feel as though being wrong means being stupid, and no one wants to be stupid.
For this reason, personal insults never help. If you insult someone the chances of them admitting they didn't know something or saying they hadn't seen it that way before are slim to nihl. If you politely explain why you think they're wrong you might engage them in spirited debate or they might concede the point quickly on a more obvious issue.
Perhaps you read someone's opinion and thought to yourself "what an asshole." Think about why that is. Maybe you found a certain part offensive? If that's the case then say "I found this part of your opinion offensive because..." If you realize you only thought that because you disagreed, don't say it.
No matter what, never revert to just calling someone a name. It does not help to prove your point, because sometimes idiots and assholes are right. (For you philosophy buffs, this is the ad hominem attack).
ALWAYS politely disagree
NEVER insult someone
2. You can be a little wrong and still be right
Whether it's your main point or a side point, you don't have to fight every point the other person makes. It's not necesarily wrong just because they said it and you disagree with something they said earlier. Once you've both made your points you can agree to disagree or you can admit that maybe you see what they mean, even if you don't agree. You don't have to compromise your position in order to compromise on a particular specific part of your opinion. You'll look better to others and feel better if you concede when your opponent makes a good point. Nothing feels good about saying soemone's dead wrong when you think they might be right.
ALWAYS pick your battles
NEVER fight endlessly over particularities
3. Be willing to concede
There's no point in getting into a debate if from the very beginning there is nothing that would change your mind. You should always have an idea in your head of what sorts of facts or arguments would convince you otherwise. For example, when a famous biologist was asked what would make him think that evolution was false he suggested "rabbits in the pre-cambrian." That is a specific thing that, if it occured, would have him convinced. If there's nothing that would convince you, then either you're taking it on faith, which is not a logic base argument by definition, or you're debating something which is blatantly obvious, in which case the person you're debating is either confused or trolling. Of course you might both be misundertanding one another as well.
You can always tell someone you suddenly see it their way and bow out gracefully, not feeling any worse for it, if you handled yourself with grace and poise. This can feel enlightening, to have a change of heart on even the smallest issue. (Hint: following rule number 1 takes the sting out of giving in)
ALWAYS consider that you might be wrong
NEVER refuse to concede when evidence mounts against you
4. Never assume you know your opponent
My roommate sophomore year was a hardcore conservative republican catholic. She had a George W. Bush magnet on our fridge, she watched fox news, loved Sarah Palin, the whole nine yards. For those of you who don't know me, I am a hardcore liberal democrat atheist. I had a picture on my wall of Barack and Michelle, watched MSNBC, agreed with Joe Biden, the whole nine yards. However, we never fought over politics or religion. It's because we never assumed anything about each other
There are a lot of people out there who hold a different opinion than you who are not blind followers. Some are, but others have their opinion because they actually thought about it and believe what they claim. Unfortunately the brain washed conveniently don't know it, so everyone at least thinks they have a well thought out opinion. For this reason you must assume your opponent has actually thought hard about what they believe. If you claim they're just a follower you could be dead wrong, even if their beliefs are stereotypical like mine and my roommates, and you'll always be insulting them.
Saying someone's just brain washed is a scape goat for not addressing their claims. Even if they didn't think of it, someone did, and they might be right.
ALWAYS give your opponent the benefit of the doubt
NEVER claim you know why they believe something
5. Give credit where credit is due
This is another great technique my roommate and I used. Talk about what you agree on first. When your opponent says something you agree with say so. If they make a good point, even if you disagree, say so. Simply saying "I agree with you on x" or "that is a good point" makes your opponent feel less like they're being attacked and more like they're having a discussion with you. Agreeing with them on a few basic points does not mean you have to concede your entire opinion. You might simply mean that that particular argument supports thier claim well.
ALWAYS let your opponent know when you agree
NEVER ignore good points being made
6. Even the experts are wrong sometimes
You can always learn something from the most unlikely of people. Just because you're a doctor and I'm a college student doesn't mean I can't possibly know something medical that you don't. In fact, when you're really advanced at something, it's easy to forget the basics.
It's okay to point out why you're fairly certain of something, whether it's a unique story of how you found out said fact or it's related to your credentials, but it's why you think you're right, not why you know. If you say you're wrong because I'm an expert in field x you're committing the logical fallacy of an appeal to authority. The theory of relativity is not right because Einstein said it, it's probably right because Einstein said it. It's acutally known to be right because of research. Similarly, a particular class you took on a subject means you're probably right, but it's not the reason you are. Mention it once if you want to try to establish some credibility, then drop it
ALWAYS assume you could have missed something
NEVER repeat your credentials as an argument
7. Act like you're face to face
It's the ugly truth no one wants to admit. We all feel invincible on the internet. We might say things to someone online without even thinking about it that we would feel horrible about saying face to face. You can't forget that a real person is reading what you write on the other side. If you aren't respectful they will react the same way they would if you were face to face. That sort of reaction is never helpful in a debate situation. If you treat them like they're right next to you, you'll realize that you think harder about what you want to say and how you want to say it. You'll try harder to see it their way and to calmly express yourself without being rude.
ALWAYS treat online conversations like regular conversations
NEVER say something you wouldn't say in person
8. Just be polite in general
You'll both feel better in the end, no matter who gains the upperhand or if neither of you does and you agree to disagree. If you are polite and respectful, chances are anyone you're debating will be polite and respectful back. You can get your thoughts out without ending up pissed or overly excited, which will allow you to think and explain yourself more clearly. This will allow you to clearly explain yourself and calmly read their responses. No matter who "wins", you'll feel like you learned something both about the opposing opinion and your own.
ALWAYS be respectful
NEVER get snippy
Comments (31)
again, you have good points : )
that not enough people knowearns my rec. : )@rhiannonator - glad you liked it =)
I agree with rhiannonator, valid points, thank you for posting
Oh how true, your point about acting like you are face to face. Of course, there is also the fact that people have more time to think about a response and therefore many think their responses are well put together.
You're too nice to be fighting on xanga. lol
Thanks for sharing this very good post
Very good points..if only people would follow them then there wouldn't be so many problems.
This should be featured. The most contentious arguers on Xanga could stand to learn quite a bit from this post.
@LucyWrites - @sweetlovinlife - @ThePraisedOne - @MangoWOW - @amygwen - @someguy4398 -
Thanks for the support guys! it's good to know that some people actually think it's worth it to be nice on here haha
This is the dumbest post ever. JK!
I enjoy good debates but many times they go overboard. Good post.
@LSP1 - haha you win the irony award of the day for that one lol
*random comment*
Good rules.
Agreed to the end!
Agreed on all these points. It's debates like these where both people leave with some new knowledge or perspective, rather than simply leaving angry at each other.
a) The theme of the debate must be clearly stated;
b) personal opinion are dismissed or not allowed; reliable sources must be at hand
c) Offensive words shall put an end to the debate, immediately.
Keep in mind that Voltaire was Agnostic.
Good guidelines. My favorite is number 7. Seems for a lot people being online makes them feel at liberty to say things they would never say face to face.
@gene546 - that was Voltaire's "personal opinion", ergo the whole thing must be dismissed out of hand. Also, I'm just generally offended in general. lol.
@jenessa1889 - Jen...this is all great and fine and well, but I have a few issues:

Beat that. lol
1) This is no fun. For one, it provides a constructive "out" for the loser to save face (the old "yeah, well, you're a doodie-head" maneuver from the sandbox of yore), and there's absolutely no more a satisfying thing than dominating an "opponent" not only with facts and logic, then demolishing them completely as they raise the white flag. It's not enough to merely wound an opponent--you must revel in the CRUNCH of their skull underfoot as they beg for mercy...and were they not so stupid as to have flunked out of Special Ed, they'd realize that mercy isn't in your particular lexicon.
2) nah, ya gotta pick a side and stick to it. For example, if you're a Liberal, and one of those fascist Republican assholes proposes something, even if it sounds like a good idea, it's a bad idea. Why? Because a fascist Republican asshole suggested it! Now, if a good comrade Liberal were to suggest something similar in the future, it would be a great idea and should be fully supported.
3) This has some merit, but only insofar as this: Sun-Tzu very wisely proposed that you should never corner an enemy and leave them no way out--they will fight harder than ever before, because now it is life and death. Offer them an apparent "way out", and they will concern themselves with the graceful exit when the tide turns against their favor. And as they run for the pass, that is the time to spring your trap, ambush them, and as our good Supreme Chancellor says: "Wipe them out. All of them." lol
4) Big surprise, but disagreed again. If stereotypes were as completely useless as everyone says... why have they existed for... well, pretty much all of recorded history, and continue to do so in full swing today? Granted, there are exceptions to every rule, but given that people tend to congregate in herds with similar values, traits, etc... *shrug* I remain unconvinced.
5) "NEVER ignore good points being made" Ok, don't ignore them, use them to your advantage. Point out how irrelevant the point or fact is (even if it's completely germane to the argument at hand), and how they're attacking a "straw man". Tell them they're not even arguing about the same thing you are. Combine with Rule #1 and state that if they're too stupid to even understand the subject of debate, perhaps they should go break out the crayons and coloring books and play with the kids at their mental level.
6) You may be a college student, but I was a college student when you were 8. AND I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express, and will probably do so again TOMORROW just for a brush-up on the ol omnipotence skillz.
7) Back in the day, "debate" on the House or Senate floor often ended up with a bunch of Congresspeoples in a dog-pile biting, kicking, scratching, and throwing more elbows than Randy Couture... in fact I think those dudes who founded Ultimate Fighting and MMA actually found some old transcripts from the Congress floors and decided the descriptions therein would make up a bad-ass brutal fighting style. And if you don't agree with me, well, rear naked choke for you!
And that has been an Unfunny Counter to your Silly Propositions.
@Hong_Wei_Loh - just checking but I'm assuming that was sarcastic?
Good guidelines, it would be nice if more people followed these (or Voltaire's) rules...
But I must say that I vehemently disagree with one point. "
7. Act like you're face to face"can quickly and easily lead to trouble. You're not face to face. You should understand that the people you debate with online are real people, but it's also vital to know that it's a completely different medium of communication. You don't have body-language cues to go by or tonal inflections. Your words must speak for themselves and you must be careful of inference - don't rely on it to carry your meaning and be careful of what others could read into what you say.
Don't take offense easily. In my experience about 98% of the time when someone gets offended by someone's remark online it was not meant to offend but was misread by someone who didn't have tonal cues or body language to frame the comment in the proper perspective.
If you make jokes, especially ones that rely on irony or sarcasm, you will offend someone. If it's in good humor and you try to put smileys and such to indicate it's a joke, someone will still take it seriously. This is especially true if you're the sort of jovial person who quickly makes friends face-to-face with these sorts of jokes. They just don't come across so well in text.
Aside from that one point, though, I agree and this basically describes the standards of conduct I set for myself a long time ago.
@jenessa1889 - No, not sarcastic. Satirical, possibly. Just my usual brand of irreverent humor ... and this time you caught it!
I am beaming with pride, Jen, see?
Fo serio. 
@Psychopompousgb - "If you make jokes, especially ones that rely on irony or sarcasm, you will offend someone. If it's in good humor and you try to put smileys and such to indicate it's a joke, someone will still take it seriously." lol and why would a psycho-pompous person be concerned with offending others? Hell, I'm neither a psychopath nor pompous, yet I enjoy those sorts of jokes, and take delight when others either take their own delight, or take great offense, from them. It is, after all, their option how to take such things.
Excellent debating guidelines. Are you familiar with "Intelligence Squared", NPR's Oxford-style debating series? Link here.
@Psychopompousgb - i agree on that account. by 'act like you're face to face' i meant that we shouldn't assume we're talking to a computer and not a person. however, you are right that it's important to be much more clear to avoid confusion
We're all human and deserve respect.
I have lots of liberal friends, including my best friend-my wife. Sometimes, they turn out to be correct. No one has all the answers.
Very well-written!
@Hong_Wei_Loh - I might be concerned with not offending others because it is generally not in my best interests to offend people. Oh, and I'm not a pompous psychopath, nor is that where my name comes from. The name is actually a reference to an old and fairly obscure computer game... but it might give you useful perspective to consider Psychopomp as the root word with the modifier "-ous" attached. Although I've not had a Xanga blog for all that long, I have used the name "Psychopompous" everywhere I go online for about 14 years. I find that people find it very unique and recognizable.
For my part, I'm actually somewhat less concerned about offending people in person - if I have reason to offend someone in person (which is quite rare), I'd be HAPPY if they decided to start a fight and give me reason to "defend myself"...
Online that's not a consideration, and I'd generally prefer to just try to give people a good impression of me.